Runtime as featured inForbesRead the article

Protecting the business

Work every alert before it’s a loss.

Agents for fraud, compliance, cybersecurity, and merchant risk investigate every alert, keep the evidence on record, and leave each decision to your team. One harness, running in your cloud.

Trusted by teams running mission-critical operations.

RainNixtlaMonoLineLeap

Risk grows with every transaction. Teams don’t.

Fraud, compliance, security, and merchant risk each work a separate queue in separate tools.

Queues outgrow the team

Alerts rise with volume, and analysts spend their time gathering evidence instead of deciding.

Rules get probed

Attackers keep testing fixed thresholds until the next variant slips under them.

Every decision needs proof

Partner banks and regulators expect the evidence behind every block and filing.

Four teams, one harness.

Start with the queue that costs you the most. The same connectors, controls, and record of work carry to the next team.

Fraud and transaction monitoring

Triage alerts, cut false positives, and trace the transactions behind each one.

Explore

Compliance

Turn AML alerts and card-network notices into case files your analysts can inspect.

Explore

Cybersecurity

Watch product and infrastructure logs around the clock and recommend a response.

Explore

Merchant and portfolio risk

Re-review merchants on a schedule and flag drift before it turns into losses.

Book a demo

One harness, one picture of risk.

The same bad actor often shows up as a fraud alert, a screening hit, and a signup spike. On Runtime, every team works from the same memory and the same record.

  1. 01

    One memory across teams

    An account flagged in a fraud review is already in context when compliance opens it.

  2. 02

    One record of work

    Every query, source, and approval is stored with the run, ready for auditors and partner banks.

  3. 03

    Skills that sharpen with every case

    Agents learn from resolved cases and propose updates to their own playbooks.

Autonomy you grant, step by step.

Start with investigation only. Filings and anything permanent always stay with your team.

  1. 1

    Investigate

    Agents work every alert.

    Your team · Decides each case

  2. 2

    Recommend

    Agents propose the next step.

    Your team · Approves each action

  3. 3

    Act on reversible steps

    Like holds or step-up checks.

    Your team · Approves closures

  4. 4

    Verify and report

    Agents confirm it worked.

    Your team · Reviews exceptions

ComplianceBeta

A risk register for your agents.

Each agent is scored 0 to 100 by what it can reach and how it runs, before and after your controls. Every run, approval, and grade lands in an audit log.

  • Scored before and after controls
  • Audit log of every run
  • CSV evidence export

Controls mapped to NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, and SOC 2.

See it on your agents
Agent riskLive
AgentBeforeAfterLevel
  • merchant-risk-agent

    7236Medium
  • compliance-investigation-agent

    6432Medium
  • fraud-risk-agent

    4522Medium
  • security-agent

    4819Low
Approval requested: 25% reserve
Read the risk guide for compliance and IT leaders

Bounded authority, across every team.

Read about our security
AuditedSOC 2Compliant

Research apart from enforcement

Agents investigate with scoped, read-only access. Blocks, closures, filings, and rule changes wait for the approvals you define.

Sensitive data stays private

Card numbers, SSNs, and secrets are masked before any prompt or log. For the most sensitive work, run open-weight models inside your network.

Your cloud, your models

Run agents in your own AWS, GCP, or Azure account, or self-host the platform. SOC 2 audited, and we never train on your data.

Protecting the business: common questions

01Do we need to replace our fraud, AML, or security tools?
No. Your existing monitoring, case-management, and logging tools trigger and feed the investigation. Agents do the research a person would do after an alert fires, and record how they reached each finding.
02Which team should we start with?
Start where one queue costs the most analyst time. Replay past cases to compare the agent with your team’s findings before it touches live alerts, then carry the same setup to the next team.
03Can agents take action on their own?
Only actions you explicitly enable. Most teams start with investigation and recommendations, then allow reversible steps like holds or flags. Blocks, closures, and filings stay behind a person.
04How do fraud, compliance, and security share context?
Runs land in the same governed memory, with role-based access deciding who sees what. When compliance opens a case, the fraud findings on the same account are already there, with the queries behind them.
05Does Runtime make regulatory decisions?
No. Agents research and prepare the case. Dispositions, filings, and external submissions stay with your authorized reviewers, with the evidence on record.
06What should a pilot look like?
One team, one alert type, historical cases first. Measure research time, evidence completeness, and false escalations against your analysts, then expand access as the results hold up.

Start with the queue that costs you most.

See agents work a fraud alert, an AML case, and a security incident, and prepare each one for your team’s decision.