Lorikeet vs Decagon
Lorikeet vs Decagon compared for fintech and regulated support teams: channels, compliance, deployment, implementation, and pricing, plus where Runtime fits behind the ticket.
TL;DR: Both are strong AI support agents. Lorikeet is focused on regulated mid-market companies with published pricing, while Decagon serves large consumer brands with natural-language procedures and a broader certification list. Neither covers the payment ops, finance, and risk work behind the ticket.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI customer concierge | AI agents for customer experience | Agent harness for every payment team |
| Industry focus | Financial services, healthcare, insurance | Many, including financial services | Payments and fintech |
| Channels | Chat, email, voice, SMS, WhatsApp | Voice, chat, email | Internal: Slack, Teams, email, voice |
| How agents are configured | Workflows, configured via Coach | Agent Operating Procedures | Agents built from your SOPs |
| QA | Coach scores every ticket | Watchtower, testing, experiments | Full record of every run |
| Certifications | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR | Controls run in your cloud |
| Where it runs | Hosted on Google Cloud | Hosted platform | Your cloud or self-hosted |
| Implementation | Forward-deployed support team | Forward-deployed team | Forward-deployed AI engineer |
| Pricing | Published, from $2,100/month | Not published | Free, Teams from $99/seat |
Lorikeet and Decagon are both AI agents that resolve customer support conversations end to end rather than deflecting them. Fintech and other regulated companies often shortlist both, because each takes actions on the customer's account and each puts compliance front and center. They differ in who they are built for, how you configure them, and how you buy them.
Lorikeet vs Decagon at a glance
Lorikeet is an AI customer concierge for complex support. Its Concierge agent works across chat, email, voice, SMS, and WhatsApp, processes refunds and account updates through your APIs, and escalates when judgment is needed. Coach scores every conversation, human or AI. Lorikeet positions around regulated industries: financial services, healthcare, and insurance. Its customers include Airwallex, Linktree, Flex, and Hnry.
Decagon builds AI agents for customer experience at large consumer brands. Agent behavior is written as Agent Operating Procedures (AOPs) in natural language, deployed across voice, chat, and email. Its tooling includes Duet for building and improving agents, Watchtower for always-on QA, Experiments for A/B testing, and Insights. Customers include Chime, Duolingo, American Airlines, and Deutsche Telekom.
Product scope
Lorikeet. A concierge plus a coach. The Concierge processes refunds, updates accounts, and coordinates multi-step workflows, with "pockets of determinism" for regulated steps. Coach reviews every ticket against your quality standards, and Lorikeet adds simulations and guardrails before go-live. It plugs into Zendesk, Intercom, Salesforce, and HubSpot.
Decagon. A broader CX platform for enterprise scale. AOPs let support teams write workflow logic in plain language, while engineers get Git-backed agent logic and versioned staging and production workspaces. Experiments, Watchtower, and Insights give large teams testing and analytics at enterprise scale.
Fintech and compliance depth
Lorikeet. Regulated industries are the core of its pitch, and fintechs are prominent among its customers and investors. It publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, HIPAA, and GDPR, signs BAAs, redacts PII automatically, and has zero-data-retention agreements with model vendors. It does not list PCI DSS.
Decagon. Financial services is one of several industries it serves, with fintech customers such as Chime. It lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI, and ISO 27001, with automatic PII redaction, RBAC, and SSO.
Deployment and implementation
Lorikeet. Hosted on Google Cloud with US primary hosting and data residency available in Australia and the EU. A forward-deployed support team configures and tests on your real tickets before customers see it. Lorikeet cites time to first live ticket of as little as hours, averaging under 29 days.
Decagon. A hosted platform that can also be deployed headlessly inside your existing infrastructure. It says most enterprises go live in weeks and includes a forward-deployed team with every engagement.
Quality and testing
Lorikeet. Quality is built around Coach, which reviews every ticket, human or AI, against your standards, plus simulations and Auto QA before changes reach customers. Runtime guardrails detect sensitive topics and escalate to your team, and every interaction, model choice, and action is tracked.
Decagon. Quality tooling is split into several products: Testing and QA before launch, Watchtower for always-on monitoring, Experiments for A/B tests on agent behavior, and Insights for reporting. Large support teams get more knobs; smaller teams may not need them all.
Pricing
Lorikeet publishes pricing. Start is $2,100 per month and Scale is $5,100 per month, billed annually, with per-ticket charges for triage, resolution, and QA on top. Signature is custom. A 30-day free trial is available.
Decagon does not publish prices. It offers per-conversation or per-resolution pricing, quoted through sales, with rates that vary by channel and volume.
Where Runtime fits
Both products are built for one team: support. They answer the customer and take the actions you expose through APIs. When the answer depends on what happened to the money, the ticket leaves their world. A single stuck payment touches four teams: support gets the ticket, payment ops traces it, finance sees a recon break, and risk or compliance may review it. Each team investigates separately in different tools.
Runtime is the AI agent harness for that work. Support, payment ops, finance, risk, and compliance build agents from their SOPs on one platform. Agents run on isolated computers in your own AWS, GCP, or Azure account, or fully self-hosted, use the models you choose, and reach the ledger, processor, bank files, and portals with no API. They start read-only and pause for approval before anything moves money, and every run is recorded end to end. Runtime runs alongside either Lorikeet or Decagon: the support agent talks to the customer, and Runtime does the investigation behind the ticket.
Which should you choose
- Choose Lorikeet if you are a regulated mid-market or growth company, want published pricing and a free trial, and value SMS and WhatsApp alongside chat, email, and voice.
- Choose Decagon if you run support at enterprise scale, want natural-language AOPs with Git-backed engineering workflows, and need PCI on the certification list.
- Choose Runtime if your tickets lead into ledger, processor, and risk investigations, other teams need agents too, and data must stay in your cloud with approvals before money moves.
See Runtime on your busiest queue
Bring one SOP. A forward-deployed AI engineer builds the first agent with your team, inside your cloud.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for fintech support, Lorikeet or Decagon?
Both serve fintech. Lorikeet centers its positioning on regulated industries like financial services, healthcare, and insurance. Decagon serves large brands across many industries, including financial services customers like Chime, and lists PCI among its certifications. The better fit depends on your size, channels, and compliance requirements.
How does Lorikeet pricing compare to Decagon?
Lorikeet publishes plans starting at $2,100 per month billed annually, plus per-ticket charges, with a 30-day free trial. Decagon does not publish prices; it offers per-conversation or per-resolution pricing through sales.
Do Lorikeet and Decagon hold PCI DSS?
Decagon lists PCI alongside SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 27001. Lorikeet publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, HIPAA, and GDPR and does not list PCI DSS.
Can Lorikeet or Decagon investigate a stuck payment?
Both can take actions through APIs you connect and escalate to people. Investigating across the ledger, processor, bank files, and risk systems is usually done by other teams, which is the work Runtime agents handle in your own cloud.
Related comparisons
Runtime vs Lorikeet
Runtime vs Lorikeet compared for fintech teams: Lorikeet's AI support concierge for regulated industries vs Runtime's agent harness for support, payment ops, finance, and risk in your cloud.
Runtime vs Decagon
Runtime is one agent harness for every payment team, including support. Decagon builds AI agents for customer support across chat, email, and voice. Compare scope, data, and fit.
Parahelp vs Decagon
Parahelp vs Decagon compared: setup speed, channels, configuration, compliance, and pricing for AI customer support agents, plus where Runtime fits for fintech teams behind the ticket.
Forethought vs Sierra
Forethought vs Sierra compared: support AI suite now part of Zendesk vs Sierra's branded agent platform. Channels, compliance, financial services fit, pricing, and where Runtime fits.